Book Review: The Bear and the Nightingale

Book Review Xmas.jpg
The Bear and the Nightingale

At the edge of the Russian wilderness, winter lasts most of the year and the snowdrifts grow taller than houses. But Vasilisa doesn’t mind–she spends the winter nights huddled around the embers of a fire with her beloved siblings, listening to her nurse’s fairy tales. Above all, she loves the chilling story of Frost, the blue-eyed winter demon, who appears in the frigid night to claim unwary souls. Wise Russians fear him, her nurse says, and honor the spirits of house and yard and forest that protect their homes from evil.

After Vasilisa’s mother dies, her father goes to Moscow and brings home a new wife. Fiercely devout, city-bred, Vasilisa’s new stepmother forbids her family from honoring the household spirits. The family acquiesces, but Vasilisa is frightened, sensing that more hinges upon their rituals than anyone knows.

And indeed, crops begin to fail, evil creatures of the forest creep nearer, and misfortune stalks the village. All the while, Vasilisa’s stepmother grows ever harsher in her determination to groom her rebellious stepdaughter for either marriage or confinement in a convent.

As danger circles, Vasilisa must defy even the people she loves and call on dangerous gifts she has long concealed–this, in order to protect her family from a threat that seems to have stepped from her nurse’s most frightening tales.


At the time of writing this review Goodreads have rated this as 4.13 out of 5


Opening Lines

It was late winter in northern Rus’, the air sullen with wet that was neither rain nor snow. The brilliant February landscape had given way to the dreary grey of March, and the household of Pyotr Vladimirovich were all sniffing from the damp and thin from six weeks’ fasting on black bread and fermented cabbage. But no one was thinking of chilblains or runny noses, or even, wistfully, of porridge and roast meats, for Dunya was to tell a story.


I suck so much.

Is there a description that describes the level of suck I am? Uber sucker? Ultra suckerino? Mucho sucko?

The reason I suck is because I do ‘this thing’ and ‘this thing’ goes like this: –

  1. I read a book
  2. I really like the book
  3. I think about why I like it and usually come to the conclusion it’s because it’s a topic I enjoy, there’s original content, the characters are flawed but interesting, the setting is unique and the writing is awesome
  4. I think about what I’m going to write on this blog about the book to convey how much I enjoyed it and how everyone should read it
  5. I start thinking how I wish I wrote the book
  6. I daydream that I did, in fact, write the book
  7. I remember that I haven’t even written a review yet and start to feel The Guilt
  8. I reads another few books
  9. I keep thinking about how I really should write up that review
  10. I comes to write up that review
  11. I realise a couple of months has passed
  12. I come to the understanding that my memory is rubbish and that I should begin to write notes when reading
  13. I come onto my blog to write a review anyway
  14. I fill it with waffle to distract from the fact that I should have written the review sooner.

Ugh. I don’t like when I call myself out like this.

This is why I suck – because I have such fondness for The Bear and the Nightingale but I wish I had written everything down more concisely at the time I’d finished reading it so that you had a more coherent and well thought out review instead of the inevitable pile of rubbish that you’re going to have to wade through.

Wow. I really sell my blog posts don’t I?

I’ve tried to do what I can but please don’t take my lack of detail as a bad sign of the book. Any lack of detail is because I should be better at writing up reviews or at least, get better at taking notes.

First and foremost, when I look back (despite not being able to remember the exact reasons why) I have warm, fuzzy feelings for The Bear and the Nightingale. I know that I can’t wait to read book two in the trilogy and the only reason I am waiting to read it is because I want book three to be out so than I can read that one immediately after.

If you’re a regular follower then you’ll know that I love fairy tales and I love folktales and mythology but I am sad to report that my knowledge of Russian and Slavic fairy tales and folktales is seriously lacking. This means that I don’t know whether the tales and stories represented in The Bear are done well and unfortunately I’m not really able to pick up any subtle ones or small nods to the mythology.

Because of this I can’t say whether the writer has captured the ethos of the myths she was writing about. I am, however, very keen to get the perspective of those who do. I’ve read reviews where The Bear seems to have been a ‘miss’ for some people due to inaccuracies and misrepresentation of the Russian culture and myths. Again, I can’t comment on this element but I welcome comments from those with greater knowledge.

What I can comment on is how much I adored the premise of this book because it doesn’t matter how many times it’s presented but the idea that belief powers mythological creatures and the lack of belief will starve them is a favourite one of mine.

This is what is happening here.

There are ancient creatures in the woods and people follow their traditions and superstitions to appease them. Everyone lives in harmony until something dark awakens. Unfortunately at the same time this happens, a new religious figure and all-round Nice Guy (note: not a nice guy) comes into play to try and drive people from ‘the old ways.’

Sadly, he is more successful than you’d want him to be. But yay, because…. plot. The lack of belief and sacrifice means that those creatures, whose duty is to protect home and hearth, start to fade away leaving the door open, literally and figuratively, for harm to enter.

But it’s ok. They have Vasya.

Vasya is a witch with second sight and can see the creatures that others can’t. Other people believe in them (before their belief fades) but Vasya can interact with them. As things end up going, she gets herself embroiled in events that are larger than she can handle.

Part of this is due to the element of fate but the other part is because that’s the kind of person she is. She’s wilful and independent and longs for freedom from the choices made for her but is steadfastly loyal to those who are loyal to her.

Vasya may be our main character but she isn’t our sole point of view and this means that we skim through a large cast of characters via multiple third person point of view.

At first, I was hesitant because this isn’t my favoured approach and I was wanting more from Vasya’s POV. But here? Actually I found that it worked having multiple perspectives. This way we can see how other people interpret the events that are occurring and it seems to highlight to us the reader, the odds that Vasya has stacked against her.

The multiple POVs also serve to make secondary characters well rounded – even those who are the villains. Konstantin our Nice Guy priest is a deeply traditional religious man who believes in what he deems as strong morals. This makes him narrow minded and closed off but we see the deep conflict within him as he pulls a Judge Frollo and isn’t sure whether he wants to kill Vasya or um… the other thing.

Vasya’s stepmother Anna seems to be a character people either hate or have sympathy for and while she does horrid things I actually see her more as a person to be pitied than despised.

Anna too has second sight but instead of embracing what she sees, she believes every household creature is a demon and so seeks solace within religion. Hers is a sad story because she acts as the contrast to Vasya. Anna suffers as a result of her ‘gift’ and her one desperate life wish – to join a convent – is stopped and she is forced to marry Vasya’s father where she suffers further. Her POV really helps challenge your own perceptions of Vasya because the heroine is never really the heroine in everyone’s eyes.

What I especially loved was the relationships that Vasya had with her older siblings, especially Alyosha who was essentially her partner in crime and I am now here for that as one of my top five ‘sibling relationships in fiction.’

What I also enjoyed was the setting. It seems that Russian or Slavic settings are coming to be more on ‘trend’ in the book world and before it passes (as inevitably the cycle of books and trends does) it’s one that I’m enjoying and I would happily read more books set in medieval winter Russian. It helps that Katherine Arden’s writing is so pretty that at times I could really picture the snow and the woods.

The book is a hefty one and at times I could have done with the pace just stepping it up a notch but it always felt like it was intended to be a slow burn with a great raging inferno of a payoff and for me, that’s exactly what it was.

I eagerly anticipate the next ones!!

I will also l try and write better notes next time. No promises though 😉

My Rating

4 Star

Here is some gorgeous art I’ve found, just because (before spoilers on the 2nd image though…. don’t scroll down…)


The Bear and the NightingaleThe Bear and the Nightingale 2


14 thoughts on “Book Review: The Bear and the Nightingale

  1. Yassss I totally feel you on delaying a book review because you loved it. I still am not able to write up my reviews on Six of Crows, Crooked Kingdom, or the Bartimaeus trilogy because I don’t think I’ll be able to do ’em justice. But obviously, you do not “sucko mucho” – just the opposite since it shows you really care about your reviews. 🙂

    Speaking of which, fantastic review! I absolutely agree on Anna – I came to be so frustrated and angered by her as the book went on, but at the same time, she was so pitiful because she didn’t have someone to help understand her powers. And the fact that she had to marry this random guy…Vasya’s father was the good guy for sure, but the book also shows how he didn’t understand why the heck Anna was crying during their first night together, and he just went ahead and had sex with her anyway. The author does such a great job writing things in a feminist light without bashing the men imo.

    Btw, that fan art is GOLD. I burst out laughing when I realized what the heck was going on in the second picture. 😂

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Oh I’m glad you liked the review, I was so frustrated that I didn’t write notes as I read or just wrote a review immediately. I keep telling myself to do both those things and then I do neither.

      Oh Anna is such an interesting character, she’d be the heroine of her own story if the story went differently. I feel for her actually because she genuinely felt like she was seeing demons, got forced into a life she didn’t want, lived in a place she didn’t want to be and then it seemed like the demons just kept coming and everyone hated her. I quite agree about Vasya’s father, yes we know him to be a good guy but even so – could he just not tell she was clearly very upset and didn’t actually want to have sex with him??!!

      In those times she was his wife so it was expected and just ‘what was done’ but now we see it differently and for it was which is marital rape sadly. So I do feel for Anna massively. I just like how complex it made the overall story though as it added layers to the characters.

      Oh I love that fanart!! It’s such a gem!

      Liked by 1 person

      1. lol same. I try to keep notes too, but then I’ve also realized that it makes me overthink the book as I continue reading, so I try to keep it to a minimum.

        And yes, Anna would totally be the main character of her own story! I actually expected her to team up with Vasya at one point, so it was kinda sad how she refused to embrace her powers in the end. Not to mention, she changed into such a bitter woman, which is another tragedy of the times I think.

        Vasya’s father I found super interesting. You can tell he’s a good man for his time, but when you see that he was so oblivious to the struggles of women… he was raised in that sort of societal mindset to be fair, but yes, that was clearly marital rape. Still love the guy, but that ambiguity is why this book was so interesting to figure out for me.

        Liked by 1 person

        1. I’ve decided to write less reviews this year (unless they’re ARCs) because I realised I don’t adore doing book reviews. I’m not a literary expert or objective critical reviewer so mainly mine are just ‘wooop loved it’ or ‘ugh no, take it away.’ If I am ‘meh’ about something I find it hard to write about ‘meh.’

          I haven’t read books two and three yet but based on book one I would agree and say that the themes are fitting for the time period. I seem to see a lot of people saying things are ‘problematic’ because they don’t like when books include certain topics. For instance the whole Vasya’s father having sex with Anna. The narrative doesn’t actually side with him at all.

          It demonstrates his confusion (especially as he had a fully consensual, loving and romantic relationship with his first wife) at why his new wife is so weepy and emotional. Well men back then (and probably some men today) genuinely *didn’t understand.* We know why she’s crying because we can apply critical thinking to it. Vasya’s father sees it as duty while Anna’s life is just a massive mess.

          I do worry when people say things shouldn’t be included in books because they’re ‘problematic’ and I’m like… well, yes. Yes these are things that are problems but the narrative isn’t portraying it positively.

          I’ll stop before I go off on a tangent because we all know how much I love those.

          Liked by 1 person

          1. Exactly. Sadly, plenty of men today still don’t understand marital rape and are happy to commit it, but at least just as many people are now aware of it and are raising a ruckus about it. But for back then, it’s definitely not a concept people had even heard of, so I appreciated how Arden was able to show empathy for both Vasya’s father and Anna without blaming either character for the ignorance of their times.

            Btw, ohhhhh my gosh yes, it annoys me so much when people throw around the word “problematic” simply because something awful is in a book. A character doing problematic things is fine as long as an author is telling you that it’s problematic. I mean, how else are people supposed to learn about these things unless it’s shown to be horrible in books/media?

            I have a similar discussion post geared up around this topic for the distant future, because it irks me to no end when a book reviewer says, “this book is problematic” simply because it has scenes of rape/abuse or a character doing really unlikable things. It just makes me…uugh. I can rant about this for days on end lol.

            Liked by 1 person

            1. Oh gosh, honestly I’m the same. I’m thinking about doing a post about ‘problematic’ because it seems to be the trend at the moment for some people to say ‘this character/ scene/ plot line is problematic therefore the whole book is problematic and so is the author and so no one should read it.’ I understand if a really horrific trait is presented positively in the narrative but I think some people don’t apply critical thinking.

              Sometimes someone is supposed to have issues because they are a complex character or sometimes a horrible thing happens because it gives us conflict and plot BUT the story is saying – guys this thing? This thing is nasty and I want you to agree with me but it needs to be in here.

              Liked by 1 person

              1. Yessss, the word “problematic” is becoming a trend, and it makes me SO incredibly annoyed whenever I hear people tossing it about without any understanding of what it truly means.

                And no shade, but I primarily see YA readers being guilty of this the most. I get the YA genre is somewhat sterilized of realism (imo), but still…whenever I see some romanticized (cough, problematic!) relationships not being called out, yet ACTUALLY realistic relationships get called problematic just because they’re intended to be uncomfortable…oof, my blood boils. 😂

                Liked by 1 person

                1. Honestly, to their standards *I* would be incredibly problematic. As would a lot of people actually!

                  Oh yes, I think it’s particularly prevalent in YA and actually most of the time I think its adult readers doing it. I think ‘hot’ characters tend to do better out of these things than the non ‘hot’ characters. I just… I don’t know. *sighs and shakes head*

                  Liked by 1 person

                  1. For sure, it’s the adults, and I find that weird. Why is it that adults who should understand realism more than teens are dictating that so-called “problematic” stuff shouldn’t be allowed in YA books? The publishing industry makes no sense to me anymore nowadays. 😂

                    Liked by 1 person

  2. This was such a nice read. I really liked Vasya as a character, and the whole atmosphere was great. I was really cold while reading it tho. Haha 😀 But i guess that’s just how great books work. Make you feel physical things too.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. I’m looking forward to following Vasya again which is good considering as there are two more books with her as a main character. I liked her too, she was flawed but her intentions are good and I like reading about ‘wild’ characters.

      Oh yes! I honestly felt like the descriptions of the setting were the best, when you feel like you need to grab another blanket you know the writer has done a good job of portraying Russian winter! You could have ‘Grabbing Another Blankie’ as one of your topics – when the weather/ setting is so good it makes you have a physical response!

      Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s